Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primordial water


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Magmatic water.  Sandstein  09:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Primordial water

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Articles for deletion/Primary water and Articles for deletion/Primary Water Institute apparently weren't enough. Yet another recreation of this WP:FRINGE topic in mainspace by a self-confessed SPA. Kolbasz (talk) 02:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to magmatic water just like was done with Primary water. As far as I can tell this is just the same article made again. I'd advise the author to consider giving it a rest. If a topic isn't notable per our inclusion guidelines, persistence will not fix that. This is not a fruitful use of your time (or ours). Not having your favorite topic on Wikipedia is not a big deal. If the topic truly is important, people will continue to write about it (off-wiki) and eventually there will be enough for an encyclopedia article. No rush. Ajpolino (talk) 21:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.