Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman bin Muhammad Al Saud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman bin Muhammad Al Saud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I believe this is essentially a recreation of a previously deleted article located here. It was created only a week or two after its deletion, by the same author, and I don't think any meaningful improvements were made to the sourcing. It reads like a CV if anything. If you go to the creator's user page, it's the same as this article. So this seems to be a vanity page with no real notability. —Torchiest talkedits 12:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Additionally, this does not appear to be the same person as Abdulaziz bin Salman Al Saud, the son of the Saudi King who was recently appointed Energy Minister. —Torchiest talkedits 13:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete - Not notable for anything other than being a member of a very important, but very extensive family. The article is also poorly written with the bit from the Hobbies section in particular almost reading like parody: "He likes different cultures and wants to bring harmony among different cultures, religions and nations. He is also fond of art. Prince also love animals and he has hundreds of camels." PraiseVivec (talk) 14:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - having checked, i agree with the reasoning above Mujinga (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of reliable sourcing. If he were really notable, we'd see more news coverage, at least, not just blogs. Bearian (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.