Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Boris of Leiningen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Prince Boris of Leiningen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a clear case of a purely genealogical entry. There is no coverage in reliable sources outside genealogical publications. It is also very unlikely that the subject and his children go by the titles attributed to them by the genealogists and Wikipedia. Surtsicna (talk) 13:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 13:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as the subject is not notable, per WP:BIOFAMILY. I searched Google, JSTOR and NYT but did not find additional citations or info. Z1720 (talk) 14:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Regardless of whether/how he is styled in everyday life, he lacks sigcov, and his claim to notability is being ~120th in line to the British throne plus some level of succession to defunct monarchies. He is not Prince of Leiningen so no redirection. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable  --Devokewater  @  15:35, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete  per nom and the other comments above. Smeat75 (talk) 16:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the additional info uncovered above. JoelleJay (talk) 06:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect - per WP:RS. Right now, there are just not enough sources in the article to source the claims that he might be notable. He has a real career and involvement in charities. Bearian (talk) 14:48, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this absurdly long tracking of the line of succession to the British throne is unjustified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.