Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Franz Wilhelm of Prussia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 06:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Prince Franz Wilhelm of Prussia
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable, only holds various pretendy titles, did survive deletion discussion in 2013 but consensus could have changed since then. PatGallacher (talk) 10:39, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: despite some his titles and styles being defunct, he notability as a member of two prominent European families, both of which reigned over imperial great powers into the 20th century. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete deposed monarchy cruft. The imperial house is part of was removed from power over 20 years before his birth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep a high profile marriage, successful businessman, former owner of the Royal Porcelain Factory, Berlin as reported at the time by Deutsche Welle - dwc lr (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete , hoax article German royalty was abolished and so was Prussia. Entirely non notable person. Smeat75 (talk) 21:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep deposed or not, he's a prominent member of a formerly sovereign house. I second what dwc lr said- notable as a businessman and his marriage did seem to receive a lot of media attention. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep agree per dwc lr, sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability.VocalIndia (talk) 06:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per dwc lr and Willthacheerleader18's reasoning and arguments. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.