Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Michel, Count of Évreux


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Prince Michel, Count of Évreux

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deposed monarchy cruft, mostly routine genealogy, no real claim to notability. PatGallacher (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete More pretender-cruft with no other claim to notability. Mangoe (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the house he is part of was in power for 18 years, they had been out of power for 93 years when he was born. Thus, they had been out of power, when he was born, for over 4 times the time they had been in power. This is an extreme of deposed monarchy cruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep French Wikipedia has a well sourced detailed article which clearly demonstrates notability. In time hopefully that content can be translated for the English Wikipedia article. - dwc lr (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete , he isn't a prince or count. Ridiculous. Nothing to indicate notability. Smeat75 (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per dwc lr. --Richiepip (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per dwc lr, but article requires improvement from French editors. VocalIndia (talk) 06:12, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BEFORE. Some of the sources from the French article could be added to the English one. Bearian (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * delete The French article says much the same as the English, except that it goes into more details of the intra-family spat over his status, which is of no real world import, and a bit more about his employment, which does not seem notable. Other than that, it's all royal-pretender genealogy. Mangoe (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete , per John Pack Lambert --Bduke (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per the analysis of Mangoe, the french article does not have the necessary sourcing for this person to pass WP:GNG either. Devonian Wombat (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. TheRedDomitor (talk) 03:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article does not meet GNG or BASIC. Since this is a BLP, its important to strictly follow sourcing and notability guidelines.   // Timothy ::  talk  01:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.