Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Naveen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep, clear consensus, AFD started by blocked sockpuppet. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Prince Naveen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

While some young person probably spent a good part of their day writing this entry, it should be deleted for Wikipedia is not a repository for phantasy and the insignificant fictional biographies of every character sauntering across every stage in the world. Hamlet this Price Naveen is not. Rasputin72 (talk) 15:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect One of the two leading characters in a major Disney feature release. Nomination rationale seems to be "I don't like it", which is insufficient.  NawlinWiki (talk) 15:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per NawlinWiki. While not a great article, this is not simply a "fictional biography," but in good faith attempts to present out-of-universe content as called for in discussion of fictional entities. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, but only borderline; there's just enough content to justify keeping it as a standalone article, and it would be quite unwieldy to merge into the suitable parent article. KaySL (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Drmies (talk) 20:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable character from a notable film. NawlinWiki has it, I think. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with NawlinWiki and others. Prince Naveen is a notable character from a notable Disney film, just as Princess Tiana is, and why should he not deserve a stand alone article? The article can be improved but it is worthwhile. Momotetetta.
 * Redirect to the Cast section of The Princess and the Frog, since real world information is minimal and there seems to be a lack of deep coverage by reliable secondary sources discussing the character individually and not as part of the film. Also, the character has not become a cultural icon or prove impact in popular culture as notable characters deserving their own pages have done. All relevant info is at The Princess and the Frog. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  01:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.