Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Nayef Bin Mamdooh Bin Abdulaziz Aalsoud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Prince Nayef Bin Mamdooh Bin Abdulaziz Aalsoud

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

So far from the line of succession that "notable, royal family" isn't valid here, particularly since there seems to be no coverage and no evidence he's done anything vaguely important. Ironholds (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are some claims to notability in the article. Is there an article on him in the Arabic Wikipedia? Are there any Google News hits which you search for his Arabic name? Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  18:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  18:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no news hits, we can do without an article on this "Tower of women". Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not favor deleting unsourced BLPs as a general matter, but this article is almost incoherent, utterly unsourced, and appears enormously difficult to source, of a subject whose notability is highly dubious. Ray  Talk 22:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Royalty is often per se notable, but this person is too remotely related to the current monarch to be so deserving. Delete. Bearian (talk) 21:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Article needs references, seems to be known for writing books, not so much as being royalty.Charles F Groves 19:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakee73 (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.