Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Odeneho Oppong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Prince Odeneho Oppong

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Placing third in a Ghanaian parliamentary election isn't enough to meet WP:NPOL, nor is the "technical advisor" role. The sourcing doesn't appear to be sufficient to pass the GNG, either: most of it appears to be trivial, routine, and/or unreliable. At twenty-seven years old, he's probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nominator - the subject is an aspiring politician in the beginning of his journey. The coverage for now consists of trivial mentions - mostly on him running for an MP. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL for now.Less Unless (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just running for elected office does not make one notable. As it stands, subject does not meet GNG. Agree that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. --Kbabej (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.