Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Odion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Prince Odion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG, or WP:BASIC. No sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS that come anywhere near containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. From WP:NPEOPLE: "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "note"—that is, "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded"". Royaltycruft: Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from family or birth.  // Timothy ::  talk  07:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  07:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  07:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Per nom. ''' No evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:16, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.