Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince of Patiala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice against recreating should reliable sources become available in the future. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Prince of Patiala

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON. No reliable sources yet on GHits or GNews. In addition, it seems self-promotional, as the career & discography parts of the article have nothing at all to do with the upcoming film and more to do with Maan's career. GregJackP  Boomer!   10:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Well... it does seem this article was written by a Babbu Maan fan with no real knowledge of what is required for format, style, and sourcing for films. A poster found on a blog site actually contains more information than does the article itself. We have producer Darshan Singh Grewel, choreographer Saroj Kahn, producton studio Ishqpura (Khantmanpur), and most everything else being done by Babbu. What it also states (unverifiably) is the the film will be "hitting cinemas soon".... but what someone has added to the Babbu Maan article is that this is a 2014 film project. Oops. Fails WP:NFF. Until filming begins and can actually be confirmed in reliable sources, this poorly written article is simply TOO SOON. Delete. Start over again in 18 months.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There isn't much reliable coverage at the moment. After maybe two years and when principal photography is completed and more sources cover it, then the article can be recreated. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:33, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.