Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per consensus. The title Princess (film), according to the disambiguation page at Princess (disambiguation) says this is supposed to be about a Danish film. Since this particular film being considered is not crated yet, the delete opinions carry more weight. Once the "new" ABC Family film is created/verifiable, the disam page needs to be fixed when this page is recreated (and I can only assume it will be). Keeper  |   76  01:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Princess (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Television movie which has not aired and little is known about. Says plot is currently unknown. Recreate when more is known. Redfarmer (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, with no prejudice against re-creation when (and only when) more is known. Fails WP:CRYSTAL. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but needs sourcing. The article says ABC Family is already airing promotions for the film. That disqualifies it from WP:CRYSTAL consideration. Can be rescued if someone posts a link to an ABC website or something promoting it. 23skidoo (talk) 18:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Absolutely nothing on the ABC Family web site under the movies section. If ABC Family was promoting it, this should be one place they'd promote it. There is a listing on IMDB for the film but it's categorized as being in production and has no more information than the article. Redfarmer (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, the article is crystalballery. Says it's under production, but it's under wraps and there's no known plot.  Not even a release date.  Per Realkyhick, no prejudice to recreation - but it needs to be verifiable first. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Rewrite, the link from the disambig page refers to the 2006 Danish anti-pornography animation/live action movie which probably deserves an entry NOT the ABC movie - here's it's page on IMBD: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavie78 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps delete then rewrite woudl be appropriate? How notable is that film you mention, Cavie? -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Rewrite There is simply nothing here so it's of no value to anyone. If adequate references and information can be provided then it should stay.  As it is now it's a waste of space. Georgiamonet (talk) 05:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.