Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Christine of Ligne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD and WP:CSD (recreation of previously deleted copyvio material). (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 06:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Princess Christine of Ligne

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Princess Christine of Ligne

Biography of a living person with no valid references, and about whom a previous BLP has already been deleted. See Articles for deletion/Princess Christine of Orléans-Braganza. A redirect from Princess Christine of Ligne was deleted, because these are two forms of the name of the same person. I have not seen the deleted article and so am not tagging this article for G4. Sourcing is even more important for a biography of a living person than for other Wikipedia articles. However, this article has two references, neither of which can be checked. The first reference, https://www.monarquia.org/, results in warnings from both Firefox and Chrome. I did not attempt to view the rogue web site. The second reference, http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/2012/10/remise-de-lordre-de-sainte-isabel-par-la-duchesse-de-bragance/#comment-325293, returns the message "Page non trouvee", and the familiar code 404. Maybe the first reference can be viewed with a special browser, but one reference does not establish general notability, especially not when there has already been an AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, Belgium,  and Brazil. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is a copyvio of some royalty wiki page (which was probably a wiki mirror originally), the same editor also created other copyvio articles and should be blocked. Also, Noblesse et Royautes is a blog, so wouldn't be acceptable regardless. JoelleJay (talk) 04:55, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.