Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Claude of Orléans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enough coverage for keep Tone 13:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Princess Claude of Orléans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Monarchy in France and Italy now abolished, article is mostly routine genealogy or trivia. PatGallacher (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The article is well sourced. Besides the matter of her marriages covered in the article (which seem notable enough given the special circumstances) she do also have had a professional life in various branches. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete deposed monarchy cruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep well sourced. Career outside royal connections. High profile first marriage and subsequent divorce. --Richiepip (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep article is well sourced and clearly shows notability. The fact the French and Italian monarchies are abolished is completely irrelevant, even members of reigning families are not necessarily notable. - dwc lr (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete  per nom. The article is fraudulent, she isn't a princess. Smeat75 (talk) 21:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep She *is* a princess, of one of the two pretending French Royal family, the House of Orléans RS covreage, including the New York Times. Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above and The New York Times reported her about as well. VocalIndia (talk) 06:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - coverage sufficient. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.