Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Friederike of Hanover


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Princess Friederike of Hanover

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not meet WP:BIO guidelines, in that it is about a person who is only noted for being related to various royal personages and lacks WP:RS. It has been tagged as needing sources for verification for two years. Smeat75 (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, as noted on thet talk page several reliable sources in different languages have been added to the article documenting the notability (as a potential future queen consort of the Commonwealth Realms) and post-1919 attribution or use of Royal and/or Imperial Highness for Friederike by media and experts in international dynasties. FactStraight (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, as notable person, as several reliable sources were added.--Yopie (talk) 23:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per FactStraight. Even if her royal status is not taken into account, it seems that she gained notability when she was discussed in global media as potentially being Charles' future wife. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources can be found that say anything nontrivial about her (hint: not just about who her parents and grandparents are). I don't see how she passes WP:BIO. —Kusma (t·c) 14:47, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per TonyBallioni. Her mention in two good sources that she could be Charles' future wife is probably enough, although merely being royalty is not sufficient by itself. Bearian (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.