Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deproded by IP. I think this subject is lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS necessary to meet WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. I tried searching for her under various combinations of her name in the databases I have access to and all I can find is mentions relating to her peerage. VocalIndia (talk) 03:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. VocalIndia (talk) 03:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 03:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. No claim to notability made, Wikipedia is not a genealogy site and the titles she claims were abolished well before she was even born. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 05:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep She is former wife of currently claimant to throne of Serbia and mother of the Hereditary Prince. As wife of a claimant she is important. -89.116.55.7 (talk) 09:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unlike titles, notability can not be inherited. Not enough coverage to pass WP:N. Ode+Joy (talk) 10:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks any real importance and is well short of GNG. I wasn't sure when I looked at this earlier today but I fully agree with Ivar's point about defunct titles and can't see any good reason to keep or even draftify. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per what 89.116.55.7 said. Relevant as a claimant. Cf. interwiki links, too.Polska jest Najważniejsza (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject is not a claimant. The subject isn't even married to a claimaint (anymore).  Even were some strange twist of history to reconstitute the dead nation of Yugoslavia, and even were it to reinstitute a monarchy, and name her former husband as king, the subject would still not be queen. Any notability cannot be based on her former husband's delusions of grandeur. Agricolae (talk) 22:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fancy title but completely not notable. --Bduke (talk) 06:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No content other than genealogy. DrKay (talk) 07:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment If someone wants to improve or found more sources I'll happy to withdraw my nomination. VocalIndia (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is not eligible for being in Wikipedia.Misasory (talk) 13:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I can conceive that the pretender to a throne is notable. NOTINHERITED says to me that a person notable for being married to a pretender is NN, unless notable for other reasons, which clearly she is not.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.