Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Nadezhda Tereshchenko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  22:41, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Princess Nadezhda Tereshchenko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not see why this person is a princess (in fact, one of the editors claims she is not), and, above all, why is she notable. We do not have articles for all nobility, especially nobility of abolished states Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep It really shits me when people nominate an article for deletion because they can't be arsed to (a) do some basic research to determine whether the subject is worthy of inclusion and (b) if so, improve the article. I knew nothing about the individual, but some basic research showed she was indeed worthy of inclusion, featuring in the book :Female Entrepreneurs in Nineteenth-Century Russia, and as a Ukrainian newspaper article notes, established a leading hospital in England during WWI, as well supporting the construction of schools and hospitals in the Ukraine before the Revolution, This information wasn't in the original article, which was awkwardly written by someone for whom English obviously wasn't their first language. So I rewrote it, added the fresh material, and it's now good to go as a basic stub. It's clear by his comments the proposer was more peeved by her noble status than anything else. They need to get over the chip on their shoulder. Engleham (talk) 04:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry to say, you are not a good mindreader. I am sorry that my behavior shits you. May be you should go to a toilet. Have a good day.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The slack attitude and grudge is even depressing in an Admin. I suggest you take time out and evaluate why you're on Wikipedia. Engleham (talk) 06:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep She was a prominent business person and community leader in areas of what is now the Ukraine 100 years ago. Whether the article is properly named is an issue for another time, and has no bearing on wheather she is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep perhaps as this seems convincing enough and would certainly imaginably need familiar attention. SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.