Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Nanasipau’u


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala. (non-admin closure) buidhe 22:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Princess Nanasipau’u

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject is a non-notable infant. The only thing there is about her in reliable sources is that she exists and that she is someone's daughter. Let her grow up. And in anticipation of the community's input: WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:WHATABOUTX. Surtsicna (talk) 22:12, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. Considering the subject is fourth in line to the crown of an extant royal family, I would argue she is notable. There's coverage in two RS which are currently in the article (I am not considering the royal family website or the Royal Palace as RS in this case). --Kbabej (talk) 02:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * What the reliable sources cover is her mere existence, i.e. that someone has given birth to her. I do not think that counts as "significant coverage" as required by WP:GNG. Surtsicna (talk) 09:53, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Birth announcements don't constitute WP:GNG. The only details we have about her are covered in Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala and Line of succession to the Tongan throne. Schazjmd   (talk)  15:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is no reason to have an article on this child.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge into and redirect to Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala (her father). Nurg (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge into a redirect to her father's article. She will probably be notable some day, but as for now she isn't. And she hasn't received the same kind of press that some other royal infants (say, the Cambridges or Archie Mountbatten-Windsor) have. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge & Redirect to Tupoutoʻa ʻUlukalala per above. There is really no actual information that needs to be merged, as it is already in the target article.  But this article has a couple of additional sources that are not currently being used in the target that can be moved over.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.