Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Nathalie of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Stifle 01:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Princess Nathalie of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg
User:Morhange tagged it for speedy. The reason was on the article's talk page:'' The deletion pages are way too confusing to figure out; this article is a single sentence with no real bio. information on the subject other than who her mother and aunt are.'' I removed speedy tag and notified user that he(?) should go through afd. But he's a newbie and don't know how to do it. So I am completing this nomination on his behalf. No vote on my part. Renata3 06:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I've expanded and wikified it as best I can. Jcuk 20:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * keep articles on royalty. Brighterorange 01:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mo0 [ talk ] 05:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep As the niece of the Queen of Denmark, this particular princess is not particularly high in the line of succession but I think she is still close enough to merit inclusion in Wikipedia based on her membership in the royal family alone. Crypticfirefly 06:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously important and looks good. -- JJay 07:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but cleanup and demonstrate her notability with information on position within and relationship to the line of succession the Royal Family. -- (aeropagitica)  07:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but please find a less amusing way of stating whatever "the princess moved to her own stud" means. - Nunh-huh 11:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not sure what the point of reposting this was. Proto t c 12:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep all princesses! Cyde Weys votetalk 14:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Royals don't have to be particularly good at anything to be noteworthy. Smerdis of Tlön 20:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. as an article on royaltly. Ajwebb 22:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.