Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Projectra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is somewhere between keep and redirect, which is clearly not "delete". Closing as keep. If you want to redirect, discuss at the talkpage. Tone 09:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Princess Projectra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article is undersourced, but the character is certainly notable in relation to DC Comics' Legion of Super-Heroes.— TAnthonyTalk 18:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just did a minor revamp, including new secondary source citations, and adding a new publication history section so the entire article isn't just in-universe character history. This one easily clears the bar imho. Ford MF (talk) 22:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that really helped.— TAnthonyTalk 22:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to List of Legion of Super-Heroes members. Even with the added sources, there is little to indicate any real world notability, as the sources are generally either plot summaries or very brief mentions.  For example, this one mentions her one time in a list of characters created by Jim Shooter, this one is just a long, detailed plot summary, etc.  This book is probably the closest of all of them of actually being a decent source, and even then, its is almost entirely just an in-universe description of the character, with only a very brief mention at the end of her being a "force to be reckoned with" in comic book history.  I really don't see anything that would indicate any independent, real-world notability for the character, and as she is already present on the main Legion character list, redirecting there seems appropriate.  Merging can be done if needed, as the article's history will still be intact.  Rorshacma (talk) 01:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Legion of Super-Heroes members per Rorshacma4meter4 (talk) 03:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Legion of Super-Heroes members. I agree with Rorshacma that the sources do not indicate enough notability to support an independent article, although I think a limited scope of notability has been established so a redirect would be an appropriate course of action. This could also be a viable search term so it would be helpful to have for any readers who want to learn more about this character. Aoba47 (talk) 01:50, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Legion of Super-Heroes members. As already pointed out by Rorshacma, no real world notability. References are trivial or summaries. Virtually the entire article is in-universe.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep based on sources already in the article. I also found this brief mention in Wired magazine .  It is one of the first things created by legendary comic book writer Jim Shooter, so I think that adds to the notability.   D r e a m Focus  16:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Don't know who she is, but there seem to be enough sources that discuss her creation by Jim Shooter, himself quite notable (and the fact that his first creation was female), in depth as well as some of her evolutions. Looks like it satisfies GNG to me, and I don't even really have to go into WP:NEXIST, but adding more can never hurt an article. -2pou (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.