Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Sibilla of Luxembourg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone can create a redirect as a normal editing action. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Princess Sibilla of Luxembourg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Having read the article, I struggle to determine what it is that is supposed to be making the subject notable. How does one even define her? Well, according to Wikipedia, what defines her is being "the wife of Prince Guillaume of Luxembourg". And who is this prince? The obscure younger brother of the figurehead ruler of a small nation in Western Europe.

The major source cited in this article, a Luxembourg royalty fan blog, says that her activities "aren't covered by the media and thus it is often hard to find news and updates about her". To me, that sounds like failing WP:GNG. Surtsicna (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 12:53, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  Megan Barris   (Lets talk📧)  14:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

*Keep per WP:OUTCOMES: consorts of reining sovereigns are always notable. Bearian (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC) P.S. See User:Bearian/Standards. Bearian (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. The sources for this article are: a statement about the ambassadorship of André Aranha Corrêa do Lago, the husband of her sister Aliki, in which there is no mention of Aliki let alone Sibilla or Luxembourg; the Luxarazzi blog described by Surtsicna; another blog cited solely to support the statement Sibilla wore a Valentino gown at her wedding; and a bare image, purportedly of Sibilla at someone else's wedding. If even a BLP-impermissible SPS has trouble finding tabloid content on this person, an encyclopedia has no business covering her. JoelleJay (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the other comment above. Smeat75 (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete We are almost to 1 million articles on living people, this is in part being propelled by our unwise allowance of articles on people with no real public function or notable action, and we need to turn the tide back.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,    Kadzi    (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how she can be considered the consort of a reigning sovereign, given her husband is not and will almost certainly never be the reigning sovereign. And anyway, what info would we even put in this article when all the current sources clearly violate BLP (SPS) and even they can't turn up anything? JoelleJay (talk) 02:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Bearian, she is not and has never been the consort of a sovereign. She is the wife of a sovereign's brother. Also, per WP:Notability (people), nobody is considered notable merely for being something. Everyone's notability is dependent upon significant coverage in reliable sources. Surtsicna (talk) 10:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete features very little that's not related to genealogy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:B610:40F8:9318:5ED5:A6C4 (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Devokewater  @  17:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 18:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Prince_Guillaume_of_Luxembourg per WP:CHEAP. I see that there is no consensus to keep, but a redirect of a spouse is acceptable. Bearian (talk) 22:54, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.