Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principal Toolbox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:38, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Principal Toolbox

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't establish notability, written like an ad. OSbornarfcontribs. 02:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. That's because it is an ad. Tom Reedy (talk) 03:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Tom Reedy.   Wikipelli Talk   15:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete any page that characterizes the product as a "solution." Obvious promotional language. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:46, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Topic appears to fail WP:GNG for inclusion in Wikipedia. After searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources. Mostly just directory listings and articles published by Fortes, the software's developer. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.