Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pringle Baronets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Singu larity  00:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Pringle Baronets

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesnt make sense Hot200245 (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article states exactly what it is about, contains references, and links to relevant other wikipedia pages. Are you claiming it's a hoax, that it's not notable, etc (i.e., the criteria for deletion), that it is poorly written (i.e., it needs editorial work, which is not a criterion for deletion) or just that you don't understand it? DMacks (talk) 16:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep as an apparently properly sourced article on a notable subject. If there is a contention that the sources are not accurate or independent or factual (as they appear to be on a cursory review), then please ping my talk and I'll take another look - but I'm not clear on any other concerns that would warrant deletion of this article. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 16:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep what Ultraexactzz sez. --moof (talk) 13:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep & snowball close as above --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.