Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print2PDF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete as recreation of deleted material. Malinaccier (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Print2PDF

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable product from a non-notable company. Created by a member of said company and article that has been deleted twice before for blatant advertising. No establishment of notability, the only refs and external links are either belonging to the company in question or are nothing more than a brief mention of its existence or press releases. Reads as advertising copy and I don't see that it can necessarily be improved due to lack of notability. Canterbury Tail  talk  17:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems notable enough; just needs fleshing out with technical details.-- TreasuryTag talk contribs  19:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as recreated content. MSJapan (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete recreation of the same content that has already been correctly speedied twice before. This is blatant advertising by a COI editor of a nn product released by a nn company. Mayalld (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.