Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Print Quota Theft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Print Quota Theft

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is unsourced and violates WP:NEO, WP:DICT. Note that article was prodded and the tag was removed. PKT (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per above Cenarium (talk) 16:36, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, nonsense. Sandstein (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain why this is nonsense? I just committed print quota theft yesterday. 130.49.146.24 (talk) 01:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. -- Dachannien TalkContrib 08:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, too obvious, doesn't tell much that we can't guess from the outset, and I doubt this is expandable. If we had a researched article on "everyday theft" style of things, this might be merge material; as such, this is a bit narrow. (Suggested additional sections: Paper towel and toilet paper theft from corporate restrooms...) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.