Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrinterOn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

PrinterOn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vanity article, no indication of notability. Ireneshih (talk) 05:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:34, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: only reference 1 gives independent coverage. I have found no Google news hits and a regular search turns up little but the company's websites and how-tos from institutions which use the product. Hence article fails the GNG. BethNaught (talk) 17:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.