Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Printz Board


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:43, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Printz_Board
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Questionable notability and non-neutral portrayal. The article is written like an advertisement evoking (in 2009) future projects that subsequently never materialized. Meanwhile all but one external source has gone dead. The remaining Link is the subjects Discogs biography. Ofosos (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom (refs checked). All other sources appear to mirror or have been populated from the Wikipedia page. A spammy article as part of a large publicity scheme to produce notability. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Known quite well for recent works, including the MegaUpload song   . I'm in the process of updating refs. 108.82.100.8 (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's worth noting that User talk:Dave1185 likely does not have an objective opinion here. He seems to follow my edits and attempt to disrupt my acitivities under cover of semi-legitimacy when possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.100.8 (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * DELETE – per nom & WP:What Wikipedia is not. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 15:52, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. What Kudpung says. Printz needs his resume deposited elsewhere. Drmies (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think this is a resume so much as a sloppy job creating the article. Looks like it was pretty much taken verbatim from Printz's company website. I'm working now to source and re-write the article, and it looks like another editor is also making efforts in this direction. It's worth noting against this this producer is very well known, in fact Grammy nominated, and has been part of recent events. it's worth keeping in a more appropriately written form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.100.8 (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.