Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prisoners' Friends' Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:51, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Prisoners' Friends' Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemingly non-notable organization with my searches finding no good results at all aside from this (Books) and search with the Chinese name found nothing as well. The only source are the group's websites and basic information leading to not much of an article much less notability (locally or universal). The article has been trimmed several times and I frankly see no further improvement therefore delete. are welcome to comment. SwisterTwister  talk  04:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I see no evidence of notability, but I cannot search properly for Chinese organizations.  DGG ( talk ) 22:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:40, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I am prepared to accept this association satisfies GNG due to the coverage in GBooks. I would at least expect this to be merged and redirected to a broader article on the prison system of Hong Kong, or to the article on Tsuen Wan, where it is located, rather than being deleted. James500 (talk) 13:36, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Notability cannot be substantiated. Senator2029 “Talk” 22:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  10:21, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete run-of-the-mill busybodies (do we have an article on "crime victims' friends' association"?), only ref in the article is their own website, web searches turn up trivial mentions and directories, fails WP:ORGDEPTH Kraxler (talk) 17:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.