Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prithvi Shaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Prithvi Shaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable school boy cricketer who fails WP:CRIN inclusion. Okay, he smacked some school record, but it's hardly top-level cricket! Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 09:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. No really strong feelings, and the article's not in the best shape at the moment, but the kid did get a heap of coverage (and still does, apparently – just signed a 3.6 million rupee/A$66,000/£36,000 sponsorship deal). Highest score in over a century is a decent claim to notability, and multiple articles in the three largest English newspapers in India is nothing to be sneezed at.  IgnorantArmies  15:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same logic as above. Tintin 15:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per IgnorantArmies, sometimesschool athletes, record-setters, and the like are notable, if they receive enough coverage. Compare Mo'ne Davis in the U.S., who admittedly received a bit more publicity. &mdash;innotata 05:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets the general notability guidelines and have significant coverage in multiple sources. &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 13:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.