Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Privacy & Security Goys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Privacy & Security Goys

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't believe this page passes WP:GNG or has WP:SIGCOV. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Websites.  Just ' i ' yaya  13:20, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I'm seeing significant coverage of the group in weekly electronic (and possibly self-published; can't quite tell) newspaper New Delhi Times (), though I'm unsure if this is the sort of source that we should be basing an article off of especially given that it's on our blacklist. It gets a somewhat passing mention in an article from the Henry Jackson Society think tank, as well as the somewhat passing mention in GNET that's currently in the article. I can't exactly access the TRAC source, nor do I know its reliability, but it appears to at least cover the group somewhat. Even if the TRAC souce provides SIGCOV, I don't think that we see WP:GNG-level coverage (i.e. significant coverage by multiple independent RS). I also don't see any way that this could pass WP:NGO nor WP:WEBCRIT, so I lean towards deletion. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 13:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - per nomination. Don't think there's enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. SPF121188  (talk this way) (contribs) 13:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete trivial coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 13:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.