Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Education in Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Icewedge (talk) 02:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Private Education in Canada

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination. Article was prodded on 6 March by with the rationale "Unreferenced original research in what seems to be a very bad translation. Fails WP:RS, WP:OR." The article creator explicitly objected to deletion on the talk page, thereby making deletion not uncontroversial, so I am relisting here.

I am neutral. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I prodded the article as unreferenced OR and it's now referenced OR. At the very least it needs massive surgery but IMHO it is seeking to make a point rather than simply relate what is the case, and as such is OR and possible WP:SOAP. andy (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - subject is notable. Article is referenced. And its only 2 days old. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 00:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep perfectly reasonable start of an article.    DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep New article can definitely be expanded no reason for it to be deleted.  Kyle  1278  04:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A perfectly legitimate subject.Biophys (talk) 03:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the article needs to be wikified and improved (and possibly moved to Private education in Canada), that is no reason to delete it. There are sources and the article is about a notable topic. Intelligent  sium  19:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.