Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Trainers Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 11:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Private Trainers Association

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is likely a result of paid editing (see my COIN posting)

The subject itself doesn't meet WP:N or WP:CORP as it's not discussed in any detail in reliable, third-party sources. The only reference in this article is irrelevant and leads to a spammy promotion. A Google search fails to turn up anything that evidences notability per our guidelines. And a google news search doesn't help either.  Them From  Space  21:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I also nominated the affiliated article, Joe Antouri, for deletion.  Them From  Space  21:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of notability.  The website itself looks "well dodgy" (as we say over here), but that's not at issue...  Tevildo (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Spam, COI, NN (V:FAIL). --AbsolutDan (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete WP:N, WP:SPAM, WP:COI, borderline G11 material. - 2 ... says you, says me 23:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.