Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private residences in Beverly Hills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Lear's Fool 05:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Private residences in Beverly Hills

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Listing homes in Beverly Hills that are 25,000 square feet or more seems like an arbitrary criteria of inclusion. It does not help matters when the only thing that is cited is content regarding the only home that has its own article: The Manor (Los Angeles, California). Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Dude! That house is not even in Beverly Hills! The fact that there are some large homes in Beverly Hills should be mentioned in that article. That's enough. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  — --Darkwind (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — --Darkwind (talk) 04:08, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * delete NN Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as it's a trivial article. Not to mention many of them are just the addresses, what good is that? SwisterTwister   talk  05:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of notabilityCurb Chain (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.