Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private series characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article needs cleaning up, but the consensus is clearly to keep --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Private series characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article is a collection of original research and lacks verifiability (the three sources are merely copied from Private (novel series), and no additional ones have been added in well over a year). The characters which comprise the subject of the article are not notable, and do not warrant an individual page. James26 (talk) 11:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete- almost entirely original research and plot summary, laced throughout with opinions and editorializing, and what little is actually sourced does not establish notability because it's not independent. Reyk  YO!  06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Perfectly acceptable spinout article to keep the main article from growing too long. It certainly does need cleanup, but that is not grounds for deletion. Edward321 (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A combination article like this is the right way to do things.    DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup/trim, and source. Jclemens (talk) 07:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per DGG and JClemens.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.