Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Privia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 04:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Privia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability, just specifications. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 17:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – Wikipedia is comprehensive. "It combines many features of general and specialized encyclopedias, almanacs, and gazetteers." The article on this widely used instrument needs further sourcing and references from reliable sources for its notability, but so does almost every other article on electric and electronic keyboard instruments – as do many hundreds of other articles which are not challenged; random example: Category:Railway stations. (Yes, I'm aware of Other stuff exists, but it should be noted that even that essay allows for consistency within a subject, for comprehensiveness, and for inherent notability.) Lastly, it may be instructive to consider that this AfD was one of about 16 for Casio products the nominator submitted today. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.