Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Adivarekar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The keep arguments seem to be a matter of fan appeal., and I have discounted them. I think we'd need more substantial ccomplishments to justify an article  DGG ( talk ) 00:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Priya Adivarekar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A person should do something notable to be in wikipedia. Dubbed for some Hindi movies does not qualify one to be listed in biaography sectio. Athachil (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC) — Athachil (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NACTOR--Ymblanter (talk) 07:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:12, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete the sourcing here is problematic, leaving this article short of WP:BASIC. Additional reliable sources welcomed, of course. --j⚛e deckertalk 03:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I recommend to check and restyle the article in proper way Scottwin (talk) 13:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: struck comment of confirmed sock puppet above, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica1000 09:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. Discussion here. Using this search string, it is clear she's written numerous articles.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete May be she has written some blogs and some articles for online editions of few Indian news papers. But does that qualify her to have a page in Wikipedia biographical section? Fails WP:NACTOR/WP:ENTERTAINER --athachil


 * Keep She is a popular entertainment journalist and dancer. Voice acting in such big films is just a cherry on the top. A young age to achieve all of this -- Thomas670 01:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC) — Thomas670 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Disagree. The profile has relevant information for the entertainment industry of India. She is a popular blogger who is closely followed by my daughter and her friends here in Turkey. I'll vote to keep this profile as it is. -- Khanabbasani 11:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC) — Khanabbasani (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep I am of the view that this profile should be kept. Priya is a well known journalist with the Indian Express. She owns a website, has a team working for her and just doesn't randomly write blogs. Looking at her vast experience in the field of voice overs and other domains, I think she meets the Wikipedia criteria quite well. -- JayaJainesh 11:55, 7 October 2014 (UTC) — JayaJainesh (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep If one can have a page dedicated to Rakhi Sawant and the likes, who have been controversial, this girl does deserve this space. She is a multi talented young girl, whose details can serve as a inspiration to other youngsters. Do not delete! -- dhwanikaxoxo — dhwanikaxoxo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Firstly, please get your spellings right, Mr. Athachil. Secondly, I strongly believe this page DESERVES TO STAY. Maybe the fact that she has dubbed (it is voice acting, btw) for 'some' (they are all prestigious films duh!) films does not qualify for you, but there are other artists who don't deserve to be on Wikipedia either. At least the girl on this profile has done several things. She is a known face on the internet and in print, social media too. -- JennaRode 04:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC) — JennaRode (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep based on comments above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep no harm in keeping, add a picture maybe though... EoRdE6 (talk) 22:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Better to keep. Multi-talented girl who is quite popular on social media and has done great amount of work as both a journalist and dubbing artist. Agree with EoRd, need a photograph. Can be taken from her website I guess. -- AdityapSingh 01:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC) — AdityapSingh (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment. We have two keeps above from genuine users and six from users who registered yesterday, created user pages (all looking the same) and went straight here to vote. These six are either socks, or canvassed from an external site.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't know the others, but this one is a genuine account, bro! No offence. I am working on editing various pages and contributing as part of a project. If we go by that logic, even the nominee has a page similar to mine.--AdityapSingh (talk) 18:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Everybody can easily check that when I have written my comment, you only had two edits: Creating your own user page and voting keep here.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have made myself very clear in the statement above. Would not like to argue unnecessarily on a public platform. Moreover, everyone is quite mature enough to know that no wiki page is saved because of votes. It is just a debate page. Thanks. --AdityapSingh (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Relisting due to the potential of sockpuppetry biasing the discussion. I have also struck the comment of a confirmed sock puppet in the discussion. Of note is that several !votes are from WP:SPAs or near-SPAs: User:Khanabbasani, User:Dhwanikaxoxo, User:JennaRode, User:AdityapSingh.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

 Now the article is updated with lot of information and corrections. But I found few of them are baseless. Claim 1: "This she did with a group of girl instructors, with an aim to spread the knowledge of different dance forms among several people". But the reference page does not exist. Claim 2: "She has won dance reality shows like Boogie Woogie on Sony Entertainment Television". But the "Boogie Woogie (TV series)" page does not say her name as one of the winner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athachil (talk • contribs) 08:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC) Just trying to help, guys! No offence. ''' --AdityapSingh (talk) 02:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete While going through random biographies I noticed this article and felt that this page is not fit to be here. Revision as of 14:44, 27 September 2014 felt like a facebook profile with following wordings which I felt like misuse of Wikipedia to create publicity. "Her personal likes include Dancing, Music, Books, Movies, Shopping, Writing, Photography", "When she's not busy doing work, she loves to capture scenic locations with her camera. She also loves to re-read her favourite books, or simply, dance while listening to music on her iPod.", "she happens to like Bollywood actor Shahid Kapoor."
 * Delete - After wasting 20 minutes I found no significant coverage in independent sources which can establish notability. As well this AfD discussion should be carefully examined due to great sense of sock puppetry (suggestion: which appears to be created for single purpose) and Afd canvassing. &#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 12:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I may not be an expert here (and maybe that's why I have been called a 'sock') since I am still learning how to edit pages and work on my project simultaneously, I just came across this. Maybe it could help http://sdads.webs.com/aboutus.html http://sdads.webs.com/apps/videos/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7nr88LVuxM


 * Delete - Doesn't pass WP:BASIC. Keep-votes don't add any reasonable justification for the article to not be deleted. Possibly, some sock/stealth canvassing going on here. Harsh (talk)  07:56, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.