Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Mondal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Priyanka Mondal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject is previously rejected through afc process, so this article should go through afc process. Please check the creator's talk page for further information. Trakinwiki (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Trakinwiki (talk)  06:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, this is the AFD process, not the AFC process, so since you brought if here, could you please tell us which guidelines she fail and why the sources do not warrant an encyclopedic article being written on the subject? Geschichte (talk) 10:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the article. Yes it's in bad shape, but the subject seems to be notable, per coverage in Times of India and Indian Express Mujinga (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The film credits may count towards NACTOR, but significance of some roles aren't clear. Falling back to sources, ToI articles on her are all two-three paragraph collections of her quotes. IE Indulge is a "luxury lifestyle magazine", a once-per-week supplement that shouldn't be presumed to be as reliable as the main paper; but setting that aside, the coverage is all shallow interviews that can hardly be considered independent. ABP/Sangbad links are movie announcements which do not mention her at all. There is a bn-wiki page, but it uses same sources as here. This bengali search https://www.google.com/search?q="প্রিয়াঙ্কা+মন্ডল" doesn't seem to turn up much, so I think there isn't enough for WP:GNG. --Hemantha (talk) 10:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The sources are either not reliable or not independent, being a collection of churnalism and low-quality celebrity nonsense. Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 01:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of playing significant roles for NACTOR, and lacks independent reliable coverage for GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.