Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Raina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BusterD (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Priyanka Raina

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability as director, critic, actor or writer. There is coverage in social media, promotional pieces, interviews, etc., but no independent in depth coverage. The article may have been created and majorly contributed by the subject (and sock), however I have cleaned up the sources for better analysis. Bringing it here as a contested PROD. Jay 💬 20:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film,  and India.  Jay  💬 20:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Skynxnex (talk) 21:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note that an IP/subject has updated at User talk:Priyankaraina2012 that The user will not be able to vote here, having been blocked in 2015. I am fine with moving to draft as well.  Jay  💬 03:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think it needs more work before it gets deleted. There need to be more sources. JRed176 (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * There's a woman with the same name married to a famous cricket player, not sure if it's the same person. Lots of tabloid coverage, they had a baby, and the like. I don't think any of it is GNG. Delete Oaktree b (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - I feel like I must repeat myself: first, substantively, she's just not notable; short film producers are dime a dozen. Secondly, I am strongly opposed to autobiographies on Wikipedia. In 2007, that could have been excused, but in 2022, it's untenable to try to sneak in a social media page masquerading as an encyclopedia article, as everyone knows what Wikipedia is and is not. To be blunt, it's theft of our services and gaslighting. Tagging . As a matter of good corporate governance, and to deter such actions against all non-governmental organizations, I would always delete autobiographies of which the only substantial content has been added by the subject themselves. When they become notable, then another person can re-create the article. Bearian (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.