Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-active Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Pro-active Recordings

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nomination. User Michaelbarnett72 had placed several speedys on this page all of which were denied. I posted on his user page and said they'd have to take it to AfD. They placed the AfD template on the page but they appear not to have finished the nomination. At about the same time they commented on my talk page that they wanted to article deleted because "i wish for my own article on my own company to be deleted as its no longer relevant, the company has been dissolved, so i wish for the page to be removed." At the moment I'm neutral as although there's planty there to save it from speedy I'm less sure whether it meets our notability guidelines. If I have time I'll do further research and change my vote appropiately. Dpmuk (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: trivial coverage. For a record company that claims to have been around as long they have, only 200 ghits (total includes wiki mirrors) isn't that many. WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 06:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.