Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-rata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn by nominator per stated improvements, thereby defaulting to keep.  Kurykh  00:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Pro-rata

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This dictionary entry already exists at pro rata. Rod (A. Smith) 19:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef. Jakew 19:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Unexpandable dicdef; WP is not a dictionary.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a perfectly good law stub, which I am working on now. Bearian 16:21, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Done for now, I hope this makes the Heymann standard. Bearian 17:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Bearian. The new article is clearly no longer just a dictionary entry and looks great.  I would like to withdraw this deletion nomination now.  Can someone please let me know if there is some official means of doing so beyond saying so here?  Rod (A. Smith) 18:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.