Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProAna.US


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   20:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

ProAna.US
Pro-anorexia website; contested speedy that maybe possibly asserts notability, so moving here for further discussion. NawlinWiki 01:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I beleive this article is important, please don't delete it. Thank you. rosaliiasan112@yahoo.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AnnaR (talk • contribs) 27 August 2006. — then updated by possible single purpose account: 24.59.119.115 (talk • contribs)  has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete non-notable Hello32020 01:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 01:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN. Rohirok 01:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't belive this article should be deleted, the information is correct, this is a high trafficked site and information should be available, nor is the information here inappropriate, offensive, or rude. Murong Bi — Possible single purpose account: 69.196.145.78 (talk • contribs) has made little or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Response Alexa ranking is below 1 million; that's not very high-trafficked. NawlinWiki 02:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advertisement, non-notable, etc. -- Kicking222 02:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Alexa Rank ~1 million, ~123 results on Google. Bradcis 04:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment No offense, but that's some awfully backwards logic you have there. Are you sure you didn't mean to say delete? --Wafulz 05:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete failing WP:WEB, reads like vanity+spam/advertisement all in one! --jam  es (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. What a bunch of awful crap --Mecanismo | Talk 11:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertisement for a website. J I P  | Talk 14:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB. Th ε Halo Θ 14:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and WP:"VAIN".-- danntm T C 21:28, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per WP:VAIN and, telling it like it is, WP:SPAM. Ohconfucius 01:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 12:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.