Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProPay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica1000 18:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

ProPay

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My original prod rationale, which I believe is still fully valid, was " Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC) The PROD rationale from Piotrus, taken from the article history, was: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back." —Swpbtalk 15:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Doh, the browser borked and ate most of my post; thank you for finishing, it, User:Swpb, and thank you User:Dylanfromthenorth for the ping. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: I've pinged the nominator to come and provide a deletion rationale; I looked in the article history for the prod reason but there wasn't one for that either. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Although patents do not count towards establishment of notability, PCWorld and possibly ecommercebytes seem to be reliable, independent sources. —Swpbtalk 15:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:57, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The (unlinked) PC World article describes a product offered by ProPay, not the company itself: . This is basically a gadget review; and it does not reflect significantly on the maker's company notability. As ecommercebytes doesn't even have a Wikipedia article, and I've never heard of it before, I don't think it is a very reliable source (but if someone wants to argue in favor of it, I'd gladly listen). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi User:Piotrus: I only provided deletion sorting for this discussion. NorthAmerica1000 12:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, my bad, I meant to . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:27, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ⨹   15:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.