Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProRattaFactor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

ProRattaFactor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not find significant coverage of the company in any reliable secondary sources. Delete per WP:ORG. Odie5533 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 04:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - article lacks sufficient 3rd party references to establish notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Apps developer with two products which have been covered as newswire items, and few independent mentions of the developer in sources.  Ohconfucius  ping / poke 03:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.