Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ProUnreal (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, no prejudice against recreation if notability can be asserted (as process went a bit wonky here, but the end result is the right one)   Proto    ||    type    11:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

ProUnreal (second nomination)
Website-cruft--Zxcvbnm 20:52, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per research in the first nomination. Normally I do not look kindly upon re-nominations, but the first one was clearly neglected and with only two votes hardly had a chance to garner a consensus.  In that kind of case I think it is fair to move the nomination back to the most recent day's nominations without closing it, in order to give it more time, rather than closing it off and starting from scratch.  NTK 22:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment:Actually, the first nomination had three votes: 2 for delete, one for keep. It should have actually been deleted: there was a 66% consensus.--Zxcvbnm 23:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.