Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Co RAT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Pro Co RAT

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot find anything reliable to prove that this is a notable pedal. The article itself suggests it might be, but to prove that reliable sources will have to be found. I stopped short of slashing the content, but that's the next step should this article be kept. Drmies (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what exactly you're looking for, but how about this list of artists that have used it? Indrek (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * We're looking for reliable sources, not the company website. Drmies (talk) 04:56, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete unless independent sources can be found for that list of musicians. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as per references added by Hobbes Goodyear, below. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has been an important musical tool for the past 30 years in rock and jazz, as evidenced by its use by multiple notable musicians and its coverage in multiple books, magazines, and websites. I've added 15 inline sources to the list of musicians, which seems to be the main area of contention, and I assure you that there are more sources out there, if a bit tedious to gather. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 21:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agree with Hobbes Goodyear above. References have been added that prove notability. Indrek (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.