Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Evolution Soccer 2008 Classic Players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Pro Evolution Soccer 2008 Classic Players

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No references, not edited by many established users, pointless, incomplete, (????? replace names) F  9  T  21:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information No more bongos 05:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Surely this is equivalent to the tracklisting of an album? Both list part of the contents of an entity. Take this for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futures_%28album%29 - Can you list the game itself or the game's website as sources? There is no where else that I can find on the internet to provide a hard link to to source it. The ???? will removed and the information completed before the end of the week. Are you not allowed placeholders for other contributors to fill in unknown information on wikipedia? Gazzinho 23:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Although the article is not complete that is no reason for it to be deleted. It is not pointless as it gives people who wish to edit their teams the correct names for the players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.123.133 (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated it, plus the fact there are no sources etc. etc. the lists can probably be found else where. Poor layout too.  F  9  T  18:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:IINFO. Noor Aalam 22:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-encyclopedic game guide material. --Stormie 05:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.