Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Motion, Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Pro Motion, Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created by single-purpose promotional-only accounts. Only one reference with non-trivial coverage that appears to meet WP:RS (this article from a local paper). OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - None of the listed coverage solidly suggests satisfying the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  08:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete- as per nom and SwisterTwister. Nothing to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.