Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probortunity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Probortunity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

An apparent neologism. It is mentioned a few times in Google Books and Scholar, but I do not believe there is enough for a notable, verifiable encyclopedic article. Ucucha 21:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay (at best). If the word does exist (and for every hundred neologisms coined, ninety-nine die in infancy), Wiktionary is the place for it. (No, I can't prove that statistic - but you can't disprove it.) Peridon (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. I must say though that this one comes closer to being notable than any other neologism I've seen. (Which isn't saying much).  — Soap  —  22:09, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Looking at the author's other edits, it appears he's trying to spruik his own business. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary or for things made up one day, and it is a non-notable neologism. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  13:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it looks like it was made up in one day, and I would say it borderline looks like an advertisement of some sort. The Thing  //  Talk  //  Contribs  17:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 19:39, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.