Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Process Contention Scope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Scheduling (computing). History is retained if folks wish for a merge. Star  Mississippi  01:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Process Contention Scope

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:N, or have a good WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: More discussion around the ATDs would be helpful in attaining a consensus here. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 19:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Scheduling (computing): or Merge the portions where sourcing can be found. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It was a quite different article before got to it in 2014 and wrote a load of content in the first person. Uncle G (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed it was, but even the pre-Kssaurab revision wasn't worthy of a standalone article. Owen&times; &#9742;  14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.