Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Processor book


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to IBM System z. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Processor book

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge and redirect to IBM System z. It's a real term for a real thing, but it's niche IBM-specific terminology with no real notability. It's not a technically distinct form of packaging from any other maker's designs, just IBM's in-house phrase for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Alt. search


 * Merge and redirect to IBM System z where it can be mentioned referenced to sources found doing the above alternative search. WP:ATD-M is policy, and should always be considered before starting a discussion at AFD. — Sam Sailor 03:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.