Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prod'homme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. --  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  08:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Prod'homme
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, orphaned. Fine to be recreated when somebody wanders along with sourced information, but since that hasn't happened for some time I feel this one garners a delete.  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  09:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - there was sourced information, actually. Someone vandalised the article and removed it; I've replaced the reference as it originally stood. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 11:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, agree with User:AlbertHerring. This article is about a brand of automobile from the 1910 decade. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It is always difficult to judge the potential quality of an article when it is still a stub. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Someone wandered along and deleted a source. Anyway, it's a valid stub.--Oakshade (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep very clearly. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Shouldn't it be spelt Prud'homme? Try googling that spelling + automobile...Rhinoracer (talk) 13:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think so - I'll double-check the source when I get home, but doing such a Google search doesn't turn up anything else on the subject. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 13:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * With the vehicle being really old and the reference, Keep. Iowateen (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I am changing my vote to Keep, and closing this. It could have been closed as soon as it was noticed that the reference had been removed. --  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  08:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.